PartialThicknessTear_HeroCutout(24901)_20250211

The alternative to conventional partial thickness treatments

The REGENETEN Bioinductive Implant is a scaffold made from highly purified type I collagen fibers.6 Following fixation using its efficient* and suture-free technique7, the REGENETEN Implant is resorbed and replaced by a new layer of tendon-like tissue within 6 months3,4,8,9 increasing tendon thickness.1-4, 8-11 and creating an environment conducive to healing.3,9,12

A decade of clinical experience has demonstrated a meaningful impact on partial-thickness repair outcomes.9,10

AdvancedHealingSolutions.png

Are you a patient looking to learn about the REGENETEN Implant?

shutterstock_2177067701-Cutout_shape_standalone.psd

Attach the REGENETEN Implant over the bursal side of the rotator cuff using the tendon and bone anchors provided; allowing it to serve as a scaffold for new tendon-like tissue growth 2-4,14 and increasing tendon thickness.1-4,8-11




By supporting the body's healing response,1,2,8-10 the REGENETEN Implant is replaced by an average 2mm of new tendon-like tissue within 6 months2-4,8,9,14 creating an environment conducive to tendon healing.3,9,12



Accelerated rehabilitation

Post-operative rehabilitation protocols are a crucial factor in helping patients get back to their lives. In a study evaluating isolated use of the REGENETEN Implant in stable full-thickness rotator cuff tears, it was shown to help patients return to work 10 weeks faster and spend less than half the average time in a sling when compared to sutured repair.*4

Clinical evidence

Recovery is just as important as the repair for partial-thickness tears, so new randomized controlled trial (RCT) data is a strong signal for the future standard of care. The results show attention-grabbing advantages for patients treated with the REGENETEN Implant as isolated bioinductive repair (with accelerated REGENETEN Implant physical therapy protocol), compared to traditional takedown and repair.

News and blogs

Stay up to date on the latest news

Head to our new REGENETEN Implant resource hub for the latest developments, including new clinical evidence, technique videos and surgeon viewpoints.

36-OASIS-US-ONLY-840x840.png

6/19/2025

35 min

Episode 3: The Partial-thickness conundrum: who needs biology and who needs biomechanics?

Listen to a discussion to learn which types of partial-thickness rotator cuff tear benefit from isolated bioinductive repair with the REGENETEN◊ Implant. Hear the panel’s views on which tears require a sutured repair or can be managed conservatively, what defines state-of-the-art and being specific in patient targeting.

Featuring: Dr Laith Jazrawi, Dr Christopher Klifto and Dr Scott Trenhaile.

20250410_PodcastJointVentures_ThumbE3

9/11/2025

34 min

Episode 5: The athletic shoulder: The role of biology to keep them back in play

Hear experts debate why athletes can benefit from biological augmentation in shoulder repair. Exploring non-operative intervention, the use of biological adjuncts such as the REGENETEN Implant and replacing sutured repairs with biology, the panel discusses recovery and long-term outcomes for athletes who expect a swift return to activity.

Dr Jacob Calcei, Dr Christopher Klifto and Dr Steve Mora.

20250410_PodcastJointVentures_ThumbE6

Related products and pages




Disclaimer

* Mean 13.9 minutes to implant REGENETEN Implant; negates time to perform takedown and repair.

** n=11 at five-year follow-up.

*** Study conducted in biomechanically stable full-thickness rotator cuff tears (n=60) comparing isolated REGENETEN Implant use to a transosseous equivalent repair.


Post-operative care is individualized and is determined by the physician based on the patient's symptoms, injury pattern, unique patient anatomy, patient medical history, and individual treatment requirements. Not all patients will have the same surgical procedure or timelines for rehabilitation. The views and opinions expressed for postoperative care are solely those of the author(s) and do not reflect the views of Smith+Nephew.



Citations
  1. Ruiz Ibán MA, et al. J Exp Orthop. 2022;9(1):53. Published 2022 Jun 8.
  2. Camacho Chacón JA, et al. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024;33(9):1894-1904.
  3. Van Kampen C, et al. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2013;3(3):229-235. Published 2013 Aug 11.
  4. Arnoczky SP, et al. Arthroscopy. 2017;33(2):278-283.
  5. Bokor D, et al. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2019; 9(3):338-347.
  6. Smith+Nephew 2020. Internal Report. 15009769.
  7. Ruiz Ibán MÁ, et al. Arthroscopy. 2024;40(6):1760-1773.
  8. Schlegel TF, et al. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021;30(8):1938-1948.
  9. Bokor DJ, et al. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2016;6(1):16-25. Published 2016 May 19.
  10. Warren JR, et al. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024;33(11):2515-2529.
  11. Bokor DJ, et al. Muscles, Ligaments Tendons J. 2015;5(3):144-150.
  12. Schlegel TF, et al. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018;27(2):242-251.
  13. Chahla J, et al. Arthroscopy. 2020;36(4):952-961.
  14. Camacho-Chacon JA, et al. J Exp Orthop. 2022;9(1):53.
  15. Wang A, et al. Orthop J Sports Med. 2026;14(3):23259671261418675.

Title

Text